Readers of this weblog will recall my posting final 12 months about how I used to be fired by Otto Penzler (OP) from writing intros for Mysterious Press’ basic crime fiction reissues as a result of he noticed and objected to a remark I made on a Lee Goldberg Fb submit about Otto’s historical past of egregious sexist feedback. My grave crime was that I had commented that retrograde attitudes like those Otto expressed on ladies thriller writers again within the Nineties helped clarify how a hideously homophobic e-book like Francis Nevins’ Cornell Woolrich biography was revealed. (Mysterious Press was the writer.)
In consequence I used to be knowledgeable that Otto had determined I used to be accusing him of homophobia, which I actually wasn’t. I used to be merely suggesting that he suffered from imperception, like, frankly, lots of straight individuals again then. (And the rise of MAGA over the past decade ought to dispel the notion that issues have gotten all that a lot better since.)
Again within the late Eighties and early Nineties, in the course of the dreadful ravages of AIDS, even the best-willed, liberal straight individuals did not essentially decide up on what appears to me the blatant and rampant homophobia in Nevins’ e-book. The Thriller Writers of America even awarded even the Edgar for finest essential work in 1989. So why would somebody like OP have been any totally different, actually, in his lack of notion?
| Like protagonist Tim Cornish, this cowl swings two methods |
I carry this up to not pound on OP once more, however somewhat as a result of I lastly learn Ruth Rendell‘s 1994 Barbara Vine novel No Evening is Too Lengthy, which was a lot heralded three many years in the past, after I was the age of the homosexual characters within the novel, as a “daring” take with regards to homosexualty. The assessment excerpts in my Penguin pb copy are ecstatic, even downright swoony, of their assessments of the e-book.
Whereas Joan Smith within the Unbiased panned the novel as contrived and false melodrama, we in any other case have within the reverse nook Harriet Waugh within the Spectator (a exceptional psychological thriller); Joan Bakewell within the Sunday Specific (a stunning construction of intrigue and suspense); Val Hennessy within the Each day Mail (Vine is writing on the peak of her powers); and John Mortimer, the lone male within the group, within the Sunday Occasions (Vine writing at her marvelous finest).
The late John Mortimer, a famous QC and creator of the as soon as a lot beloved Rumpole of the Bailey e-book sequence and tv program and–rather surprisingly to me judging by soley by his looks–a infamous longtime girls’ man, chosen No Evening is Too Lengthy as one in all his 1994 books of the 12 months.
In Mortimer’s assessment the creator famous that in Evening, which he lavishly praised as a “darkish, watery masterpiece…suffused with sexuality,” Rendell had daringly “written within the particular person of a younger gay man.” 13 years later England’s Each day Mail newspaper salaciously divulged that the topic of younger gay males had hardly been an unfamiliar one to Mortimer. Within the story on the celeb creator the Mail pantingly imparted to its readers that 65 years earlier he had despatched “sexually specific” letters to a ravishing male youth.
![]() |
| John Mortimer in school across the time he conceived a pash for Quentin Edwards |
“Revealed,” ran the DM headline on 12 October 2007, “John Mortimer’s Romantic Letters to a Schoolboy Which Led to Him Leaving Oxford.”
Plainly again in 1942 Mortimer, then a precociously intelligent nineteen-year-old Oxford pupil, was going by means of what was euphemistically termed an aesthetic part. Sneered Richard Pendlebury of the Mail:”The sensible younger Mortimer minced concerning the quads in a velvet jacket with purple trousers…quoting poetry [TPT-!] and buzzing Noel Coward ditties.“
This blithe velvet jacketed ditty hummer quickly was knocked for a loop, nevertheless, when he”conceived a violent ardour” for a stunning schoolboy two years youthful than himself who was visiting Oxford with a buddy.
To this dreamy younger object of his ardor and affection, along with his liquid eyes, pert nostril and beestung lip, the bespectacled, bookish Mortimer despatched quite a few randy “pash” letters. He even took him for a romantic trip for 2 in a punt on the River Cherwell. (Crime author Hugh Wheeler of Patrick Quentin fame did so too again within the day–romantic punt rides appear to have been somewhat the factor for courting lads, whether or not homosexual or straight.)
The 2 boys additionally attended ballet collectively and Mortimer gifted his beloved with a duplicate of Shakespeare’s sonnets, the importance of which can instantly be apparent to any queer literary lad worthy of his violet quill. As MAGA would wittily say: “Ga-aay!“
![]() |
| all grown up Mortimer at age 25 |
Mortimer’s younger inamorato was Quentin Edwards, who later himself turned a outstanding English QC and decide. Like so many homosexual romances again in these days, the affair sadly took a considerably tragic flip. When Mortimer’s racy, suggestive letters to Edwards had been found at Edwards’ faculty, the boy was expelled and Mortimer, who was accused of getting “corrupted” him (or groomed him into gayness as could be mentioned at the moment), was despatched down from Oxford, although he was finally allowed to take his diploma.
Along with his mom lifeless and his father far-off in India, Edwards labored on a farm and at a manufacturing unit earlier than enlisting within the Royal Navy the following 12 months when he turned 18. He grew his well-known side-whiskers to look older (and maybe, one wonders, to discourage passes from sailors).
All in all, issues might have gone worse for them and each boys went on to dwell lengthy, fulfilled lives, get pleasure from distinguished careers, take wives (and mistresses in Mortimer’s case) and beget youngsters.
![]() |
| within the navy a whiskerless Quentin Edwards the thing of John Mortimer’s youthful wartime obsession |
When all these particulars got here out a couple of years earlier than Mortimer’s demise at age 85 in 2009, each Mortimer and Edwards admitted that they certainly had had a mutual “crush” on one another however each of them denied that there had been any kind of lively carnal component to their relationship. Edwards, then 81, insisted:
It was all about nothing! We had been to single-sex public colleges, the place individuals type romantic friendships which aren’t actually fairly gay. I used to be not a gay, by no means have been, and neither, the reality is, was John….
For his half John conceded to having had “completely nice gay experiences” earlier when a schoolboy at Harrow, explaining colorfully that homosexuality merely had run rife there: “You possibly can have any boy for a field of Cadbury’s milk chocolate.” He himself most well-liked boyish ladies, to make sure, however ladies of any type had been sadly unavailable in Harrow’s same-sex setting.
Diamonds and pearls, as rock star Prince as soon as lilted, for a fairly boy or a woman. If you do not have the gorgeous lady you accept the gorgeous boy. Simply be sure to can supply the boys Cadbury’s chocolate bars and the ladies some good pairs of nylons. (There was a struggle on then, do not you already know,)
John Mortimer died at age 85 in 2009, Quentin Edwards at age 85 the following 12 months. Edwards’ 2010 obit within the Occasions described him as “immediately recognisable along with his plentiful side-whiskers, half-moon spectacles and rosy cheeks” and a flamboyant Wildean “dandy” with a “penchant for braces, silk scarves, rings, cufflinks, a pocket watch and hats for each event.” By no means would the person do one thing half so vulgar as to don “a short-sleeve shirt, even on a sea cruise” however he did generally, like Lord Peter Wimsey or some foppish man-about-town homicide suspect in Golden Age detective fiction, screw a monocle to his eye.
![]() |
| Quentin Edwards later in life |
These English boarding faculty same-sex romances usually strike People as considerably weird (and plenty of would add immoral), however that is the English public faculty system, or no less than so it was at one time, when the righteous English male institution (half of which at instances appears to have buggered the opposite half) merely shut its eyes to what was happening amongst its elite schoolboys and, worse but, between its masters and boys.
I am going into this extra under, however there’s a part of No Evening is Too Lengthy, the place protagonist Tim Cornish displays on his schoolboy gay experiences, which should have struck very near residence for Mortimer when he was studying the e-book. Certainly, I’ve to wonder if Mortimer–who was a buddy of Rendell’s, anthologized her work and praised her tremendously in print (She is one in all our most vital novelists)–told Rendell one thing of his personal schoolboy sexual experiences and she or he then drew upon this when writing Evening.
![]() |
| Was this the unique striding shadowy determine, used a lot for crime fiction covers at the moment? |
Rendell herself informed a newspaper interviewer within the Nineties that her novel was “about selfishness, about self-importance, a couple of very, very handsome man who thinks his handsomeness offers him the precise to do something.”
Rendell might have positioned this ever so useless character, Tim Cornish, strictly in a heterosexual context, in fact, however she selected to make him, no less than initially, queer–whether asexual, gay or bisexual, it is not fairly clear, although he finally ends up, apparently, heterosexual. So you may say, riffing on Dorothy Parker, that the e-book runs the gamut of feelings from AC to DC.
Rendell included queer characters in her books from her very first revealed one in 1964 up by means of no less than her final Barbara Vine, The Kid’s Youngster, revealed in 2012, lower than three years earlier than her demise. Lesbians function importantly in no less than two of her novels, however she appears extra to have favored together with her attentions homosexual males.
Homosexual males function considerably in The Lake of Darkness (1980), No Evening is Too Lengthy and The Kid’s Youngster, all of which have queer protagonists. Moreover different books, like A Deadly Inversion, have decidedly homoerotic components, even when the queerness by no means breaks out into full flame.
“I had a cousin who was homosexual and ultimately died of an AIDS-related sickness in 1989,” Rendell divulged a couple of years earlier than her demise in 2015. “He was put although aversion-therapy, which was fairly grim–this should have been within the Seventies, I believe–and it was so horrible he ran away. In fact I knew he was gay–we had been nice associates in addition to cousins. He was very sad and infrequently very disagreeable. It sours the character, that kind of factor.“
![]() |
| We Can Work It Out these are mentioned to be rediscovered photographs of a same-sex marriage ceremony in Philadelphia in 1957 |
Possible this too impacted Rendell’s later writing about male homosexuality. And he or she’s completely proper about this.
Anybody subjected to the kind of factor Rendell’s cousin was–or even a lot less–back within the Seventies or Eighties and even the Nineties could be apt to bitter on life. And to throw AIDS into the combination as effectively! It is all a horrible and tragic factor, all of the lives that had been sacrificed in these days, each to a mortal illness and a social taboo. However, some homosexual males managed to make lives for themselves and dwell fortunately as homosexual males. It is a fable to assume all homosexual males had been miserably sad again then.
In fact each the Rendells and Vines are full of scores upon scores of sad, broken individuals and the queer ones are not any exceptions–indeed, removed from it. Problematically in No Evening is Too Lengthy, no less than for a homosexual reader, is the way in which the creator appears to exit of her approach to forestall the queer characters from being pleased collectively. Did Rendell imagine such a factor as happiness was even attainable for homosexual males in 1994, or was she influenced by the experiences of males like her cousin and John Mortimer to assume in any other case?
At one level she has her homosexual lovers, who’re afraid to kiss in public (considerably unbelievable it appears to me in 1994), speculate that same-sex marriage will not change into a actuality for 25 and even 50 years. 25 wasn’t too far off the mark, I suppose, although 50 appears absurd, no less than looking back (although once more, who is aware of what MAGA might be hatching within the US).
Right here in 2025 one would have needed to have been born, I might say, by the early Eighties to have a lot recollection of the bizarre world for queer people–or anybody else–in 1994. No social media to talk of, no emails and texts and Twitter and TikTok and you continue to acquired your tradition filtered although print books and magazines and cable tv applications. Within the US Mates premiered on TV solely that 12 months, whereas gay-friendly Will & Grace was nonetheless 4 years away, however a glimmer in a scripter’s eye. Its homosexual kiss scene got here close to the demise of the 20th century in 1999 (see video instantly under). That very same 12 months the way more daring British homosexual drama sequence Queer as Folks premiered. That quickly was remade within the US too.
There have been impartial homosexual movies, in fact, however these flicks by no means performed in a lot of the nation. The latest precise hit homosexual movie was a tragic AIDS drama, Philadelphia (1993), which, whereas well-meant, simply continued the affiliation between gayness and demise. (Ruth Rendell’s 1992 Inspector Wexford detective novel Kissing the Gunner’s Daughter has an AIDS plot strand.)
The subsequent 12 months Australia daringly gave us the trans/drag dramedy The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert, however a lot of the world by no means knew of it, I suppose, till America remade it in 1995 as To Wong Fu, Thanks for Every part! Julie Newmar. (The unique is a lot better.) A 12 months later America did the identical factor with The Birdcage, a success belated remake of the French homosexual drag farce La Cage aux Folles (1978) starring Robin Williams which made a scene-stealing stage actor Nathan Lane, who performed Williams’ drag-donning partner, a movie and tv star.
I do not recall there being lots of social blowback to those movies from conservatives, however then we did not have social media to amplify rightwing outrage. (There was simply Rush Limbaugh rumbling on the radio.) With social media nonetheless in its infancy by the top of the last decade, tv and movies remained the key ways in which most individuals, each queer and straight, realized about queer individuals.
![]() |
| Simply three fun-loving guys (?) Hugo Weaving, Man Pearce and Terence Stamp in The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert |
Identical-sex marriage was authorized nowhere within the nation till 1999 when the progressive state of Vermont dominated that the state’s homosexual marriage ban was unlawful. In 2003 the US Supreme Court docket dominated anti-sodomy legal guidelines unconstitutional. The UK enacted civil partnerships for same-sex {couples} in 2004 and legalized homosexual marriage a decade later, not lengthy after The Kid’s Youngster was revealed. Within the US the Supreme Court docket struck down homosexual marriage bans the following 12 months. In interviews about this e-book Rendell had known as for the legalization of same-sex marriage, opining that homosexual males had been nonetheless very a lot feared by a lot of the general public. “[N]obody actually cares about lesbians, do they?” she remarked to her interviewer. “It is [the] penetration [of one male by another male] that bothers them.”
So when going again and taking a look at Rendell’s dealing with of queer matter in No Evening is Too Lengthy, one has to permit that the Nineties was a decade of transition that in some methods had extra in frequent with the previous than the current. And the previous is one other nation and the customs of that nation could seem somewhat unusual (ig not queer) to us at the moment. Or maybe not–I believe one actually has to query whether or not a majority of america really is genuinely dedicated to equal rights for queer individuals, to not point out ladies and racial, ethnic and non secular minorities.
Nevertheless, I am not likely involved right here with conservatives, or traditionalists, or no matter you need to name them, however somewhat with liberals of fine will, like Ruth Rendell. And right here I’ve to confess that I discover Rendell’s dealing with of queer characters in Evening considerably problematic.
![]() |
| a kind of poison pen novel Is the pen wielded by a lifeless man? Or is one thing else afoot? |
No Evening is Too Lengthy is about a ravishing younger man in his mid-twenties, Tim Cornish, the narrator of the majority of the novel. When the story opens Tim resides in close to seclusion at his mum or dad’s beachside home in coastal Suffolk and struggling “fearful regret” about somebody he says he killed. It does not assist that he is been receiving a gradual stream of subtly menacing letters,all of them postmarked from America, which allude to his heinous act.
It is quickly made clear that Tim’s sufferer was Ivo Steadman, a distinguished and good-looking paleontologist (he even had a black forelock that conveniently fell over his brow) in his early thirties who taught on the college the place Tim was a graduate pupil in inventive writing and was Tim’s lover for over a 12 months. Plainly on a cruise in Alaska that Tim and Ivo took collectively, one thing fairly horrible occurred between the the 2, however what precisely?
The Nineties being the height of Rendell’s wordy novel part, the place they sometimes ran over 100,000 phrases, it takes the reader somewhat a very long time certainly to search out out what precisely occurred, except the reader impatiently begins skipping pages. You might be tempted to skip. I used to be.
The primary a part of the novel, depicting Tim’s wretched current, may be very atmospheric, drawing on one in all Rendell’s favourite authors (and mine too), M. R. James, the nice English ghost story author, in depicting how Ivo is consistently showing to Tim in his desires and in his home (!) and on the streets and the seaside (!). It jogged my memory of the nice horror movie It Follows (2014). It is also attention-grabbing studying concerning the starting of Tim’s affair with Ivo at college.
There’s some welcome humor in Rendell’s depiction of a presumably homosexual or asexual inventive writing trainer (he wears his black cat draped round his shoulder like a stole, we’re informed) who’s a maddening pedant with a a fierce hatred of contractions. Rendell herself might get somewhat pedantic about grammar–she hated web speak–so I believe there is a little bit of self-satire right here.
You may name this the precise “homosexual” a part of this lengthy novel (about 135,000 phrases by my rely), the half which supplies the e-book no matter declare it has to being a homosexual thriller novel. That is the place we get Tim’s ideas on intercourse at his boys’ public faculty, Leythe:
Nobody might have handed by means of Leythe with out usually participating in sexual exercise, and collaborating in it as a matter in fact. You probably did it, and that was that….
Love existed, in fact, or somewhat a lustful or sentimental obsession. James Gilman, 5 years my senior, was in love with me, and wrote dangerous poetry to me. Prefects had been at all times in love with some first- or second-year, and in a couple of circumstances this idol was saved on his pedestal, the recipient of love-letters and even sonnets, his {photograph} on a research desk. Principally, although, he too was utilized in the way in which of all flesh.
![]() |
| room with a view an Edinburgh Home inside May that be Ivo developing from the ocean? |
Rendell was nonetheless curious about intelligent plotting at this level in her profession and you may ensure that if a personality’s title retains cropping up they’ll ultimately function within the plot in some important type or vogue. Late within the novel James Gilman, who has change into an lawyer like the actual life Quentin Edwards, notably seems when by letter he confesses to his spouse:
Once I was eighteen and Tim was 13 I used to be in love with him, I used to be deeply in love and it consumed my entire existence. He wasn’t in love with me, that goes with out saying, however he was good to me and compliant, he did what I wished. You perceive me, I am positive, I do not need to use the phrases. He was good to me for the favors I might do him and at Leythe fourteen years in the past, imagine, a first-year wanted all of the favours he might get.
In a while the letter James recollects, referencing Tim, “issues he as soon as mentioned to me, accidents he did me, his callousness and kindness, his opportunism and gratitude.” The “love” which James had for this thirteen-year-old boy, he assures his spouse, who I might assume could be getting fairly frightened by this level, “is lengthy gone.” Nicely, okay, then, to not fear!
Frankly, I discovered this extra twisted than something within the e-book. When John Mortimer had his pash with Edwards (which can not have even been sexual), he was 19 and Edwards 17, however in Rendell’s novel the 2 males are 18 and 13. That is a somewhat alarming, I might say, however the members take it as a matter of nature’s rutting course and speak about it as if Tim might have been in any sense a consenting associate to what went on. Tim at 13 is seen as the identical “coquette” and tease as he was a decade later. Can this be actual? I do not think about most dad and mom would take such a sanguine view of their 13-year-old being buggered at college by an 18-year-old (legally an grownup). Or would they’ve mentioned, effectively, no less than it wasn’t the headmaster!
In 1982, again across the time Tim and James would have been having it off with one another at Leythe, Elton John reduce a video for his tune Elton’s Music, his first music, after a decade of giant hits, written particularly as a homosexual music. I recall listening to this reduce on his album The Fox, the primary Elton John album I ever purchased (I used to be 16 on the time) and considering, wow, that is positively homosexual, no room for doubt there, even when Elton in any other case did appear to be attempting to get his queer arse again within the closet once more.
![]() |
| Do not ask, do not inform do not hear, do not converse, do not see Bronski Beat in 1985 publicity photograph |
Elton’s Music is a plaintive piece about an ungainly younger schoolboy with a determined crush on a devastatingly good-looking and debonair older one (see video instantly above). The 2 lads within the video really look concerning the ages that Tim and James would have been, however the relationship is reversed: it is the youngest boy who’s in love with the older one. And naturally nothing ever really occurs between the 2 of them, though within the music lyrics the youthful boy passionately boy avows: “I might give my life for a single evening beside you.” To me this appears way more plausible than Rendell’s situation.
Even this video apparently was deemed too controversial for tv, nevertheless, method again in 1982. You will discover a terrific evaluation of it right here. Unapologetically homosexual English rock teams like Frankie Goes to Hollywood and Bronski Beat quickly adopted, nevertheless, together with the very suggestive, albeit melancholy, lyrics of Morrissey, coyly sexually ambiguous entrance man for The Smiths. The closet was too full for the door to get shut once more, strive as antigay activists just like the late magnificence queen and orange juice huckster Anita Bryant may. Elton had lit a rainbow candle within the wind and the sunshine it gave would flicker however by no means exit.
Getting again (lastly) to Rendell’s novel, as an grownup her character Tim Cornish will get bored along with his affair with Ivo and needs to dump him as he dumped Janes, however problematically Ivo now could be madly and one may say violently in love with him. Then in Alaska Tim falls in love with a lady, Isabel, and decides he is in all probability not really homosexual, in any case. Such a fickle, fickle boy!
![]() |
| the 2002 movie model |
The decision of this triangle, which comes somewhat rapidly and perfunctorily on the finish of the prolonged novel with a somewhat maddening twist of kinds, did strike me, prefer it struck Joan Smith, as contrived and passing implausible. I might assume trendy homosexual readers could be intensely dissatisfied on the method Rendell vigorously swabs the deck of the love boat clear of the final speck of gayness as a way to make method for heterosexual romance with Isabel, who herself comes off as a plot contrivance: the hetero ex machina, if you’ll.
Certainly, when studying this novel I saved considering how I might have “improved” it, which is at all times a foul signal, little doubt. I assume you may say it is a queer curate’ egg, homosexual solely in spots.
There’s a 2002 movie model of the novel and I might be curious about seeing what was finished with Rendell’s plot. I discover that they made Ivo blond and and Tim brunett, which is exactly the other of the novel. The actor enjoying Ivo was 34, the actor enjoying Tim was 27, so that they did get the ages proper, roughly.
(UPDATE: I’ve now seen the movie, which was scripted by the late homosexual playwright Kevin Elyot, who wrote a dozen scripts for the Poirot and Marple sequence across the identical time, and the movie finally takes a way more condemnatory, unsentimental view of Tim. It completes the punches that Rendell pulls and makes for a extra artistically efficient, albeit bleaker ending.)
![]() |
| beachfront at Aldeburgh |
What pursuits me most now about this novel is whether or not John Mortimer may even have helped encourage it. I suppose that we will by no means know now. To make sure, there are a lot of such tales about schoolboy same-sex affairs in England, so many who generally it does come off as a ceremony of passage earlier than you progress on to higher–i,e, heterosexual–love. I left the novel feeling like this was Rendell’s personal view, that homosexual love is one thing lesser–more sexual, much less non secular, in case you will–than straight love. Homosexual intercourse within the e-book is ceaselessly portrayed as near-rape–anal penetration, recalling what Rendell mentioned, bothers individuals, do not you know–though not her, in fact!
Or was this what she, or her publishers, thought her studying public wished from her, simply to dabble, like Tim, in gayness? To write down an actual homosexual novel in that day was to go “area of interest,” in any case, to ghettoize oneself to the “homosexual thriller” part of the bookstore, if the bookstore even had one.
![]() |
| Intercourse as rape? The homosexual characters go roughly at it in No Evening is Too Lengthy |
In any case, I remorse to say that I personally discovered No Evening is Too Lengthy an unsatisfying and finally massively disappointing novel, regardless of some good options. I a lot most well-liked Asta’s Guide (1993) and The Brimstone Marriage ceremony (1996), the Vines which coated No Evening is Too Lengthy on each side. Not solely are they extra complicated novels, dexterously skipping backwards and forwards many years in time, however they’re informed by means of the views of center class straight white ladies.
To be trustworthy I believe Rendell was extra snug on this floor. It is not one thing the creator needed to write about vicariously. She was fairly able to writing from the angle of straight males, I’ll permit, however homosexual males? I am not so positive. What I’ve learn of her final Vine novel, The Kid’s Youngster, hasn’t persuaded me.
To be truthful, here is one other perspective on the topic, actually fairly fascinating, from a person who grew up queer in Waco, Texas and located studying Barbara Vine a revelatory, transformative expertise. In fact he was caught in Waco, Texas. However how happy I believe Ruth Rendell would have been to have recognized that she positively impacted somebody’s life in such a method.
Apparently earlier than his Rumpole of the Bailey days John Mortimer wrote a one-act play known as Bermondsey a couple of pub keeper who has had a male lover over the eighteen years of his marriage. It was carried out on stage in 1970 after which televised two years later with the actors Dinsdale Landen and Edward Fox within the roles of the male lovers. Within the play Landen and Fox (who somewhat was one in these days) shared an intimate full-on-the-lips kiss, the kind of factor that was nonetheless deemed too scandalous on American tv within the Nineties. It appears to have been a extra optimistic depiction of a homosexual male couple than something I’ve but encountered within the work of Ruth Rendell or her alter ego Barbara Vine (see instantly under).
For these holding rely, I believe that is now the fourth Vine I’ve reviewed right here on the weblog. There are fourteen Vines. My favorites, ranked, are:
1. Asta’s Guide (1993)
2. A Deadly Inversion (1987)
3. A Darkish Tailored Eye (1986)
4. The Brimstone Marriage ceremony (1996)
5. The Home of Stairs (1988)
6. The Blood Physician (2002)
The others I’m not so sizzling on, although I nonetheless must learn The Chimney Sweeper’s Boy and The Kid’s Youngster, the latter of which I’ve began twice now however by no means really completed. (Not less than it appeared higher than The Birthday Current.) Sometime I must reread Gallowglass, which appeared extra of a “Rendell” than a “Vine” (as did King Solomon’s Carpet). Extra meals for thought in all, no shadow of a doubt.












.jpg)


